On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 09:41:49AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > That's a totally different problem. It can be easily solved by raising > its priority. Although I haven't had any requests to do so up till now. > Do others feel the same way about this? IMHO traceroute should be priority standard. i just installed a few machines recently and thought to myself "what the fsck, traceroute is not installed" when i tried to run /usr/sbin/traceroute later on. iirc a package should be priority standard if it invokes a `what the fsck! where is foo?!' from the user/admin if its not present by default. although apt-get made it less then a big deal it still seemed odd. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpPuzOQrDMLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature