Re: WNPP now on the BTS
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:28:22AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > The tags to be used and corresponding severities would be:
> > O important The package has been Orphaned. It needs a new
> > maintainer as soon as possible. If the package
> > as a Priority of standard, required or essential,
> > the severity should be set to grave.
> What do you mean by "orphaned" here? The Maintainer field has been
> set to "email@example.com"? Or that it should be moved to
What is the correct way to orphan a package now?
Uploading with maintainer set to firstname.lastname@example.org *and*
filing a bug against wnpp or only one of these actions?
P.S.: BTW, Anthony, you should trim the mail that you are citing, and not
resend the whole thing. Apart from saving bandwidth and storage room
it 'll be easier to find your remarks...