Re: Updating build-essential package list
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> I said "most of" and not "all", that is sufficient IMHO.
> gcc is build-essential, however some packages don't use it at all either.
Have you read the current definition of build-essential?
It will not be necessary to explicitly specify build-time
relationships on a minimal set of packages that are always needed to
compile, link and put in a Debian package a standard "Hello World!"
program written in C or C++.
How would you change this so that it is still unambiguous and it includes
debhelper? (Please don't even consider mentioning debhelper explicitly.)
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % email@example.com % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%