Re: My (less-then-important) personal position
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> I don't think it's an "either-or" thing. Free software is great, but
> we should also service the needs of our users. Personally, I think we
> do a good job of providing a free system that can be augmented by
> various packages that fail the DFSG, but that we keep around because
> (a) users want them and (b) developers are willing to maintain them.
hm. i'm not so sure. if the "needs of our users" included a crack habit,
would i feel i needed to service that need too? ok, so my example was a
bit to extreme extreme. >:) i do believe there has to be *focus* though.
we decide what we're good at, and then focus on that. not *every* need of
the user needs to be served directly by Debian.
> Can we serve our users with only free software? Yes. But we can
> serve them better by providing some additional software. Personally,
> I'd rather people use Debian with 1-6 non-free additional packages
> they get from us than have them buy from Corel or Stormix, ending up
> with some hodgepodge of free and non-free software. Without those 1-6
> packages (different for everyone ;-), a lot of people won't use
> Debian. I think we can sacrifice a bit of purity for some acceptance
> in the domain of Linux users (heaven forbid I use a word like
> "marketplace"... that might sound like PR. ;-)
I don't come to the same conclusion as you about not having those 1-6
non-free addtional packages. I have tried additional software from
non-Debian sources, both in .deb and tarball formats (actually, some even
in .rpm format). Some of it was free, and some non-free. The fact that I
had to go outside of Debian to try it out doesn't make me any
less-inclined to want to use Debian. OK, perhaps I'm not a "typical"
user (whatever that is). But I fail to see how "the marketplace" in the
"age of the Internet" would be any different. Must your entire system be
installable off a single set of CDs? I think by now people are used to
obtaining software from a variety of sources, and so this argument that
"people won't use Debian if it doesn't contain non-free" (and it doesn't
anyway ... that's just an illusion) just doesn't hold water.
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca firstname.lastname@example.org
Debian http://www.debian.org email@example.com
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]