Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
From: Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:48:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000613114849.E20035@wau.mis.ah.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000611000009.D1066@the-merlin.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de>; from tali@rommelwood.de on Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 12:00:09AM +0200
References: <[🔎] 393D1083.55934DE8@efore.fi> <[🔎] 20000606175538.I25792@tausq.org> <[🔎] 20000611000009.D1066@the-merlin.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de>

On Sun 11 Jun 2000, Martin Waitz wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 05:55:38PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > The boot logo is a side effect. If you think it is ugly I
> > suggest asking the upstream kernel maintainers to supply better logos.

> why not use the debian logo?

Seconded!

> have a look at fblogo (http://home.sol.no/~dvedoy/)


Paul Slootman
-- 
home:       paul@wurtel.demon.nl http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work:       paul@murphy.nl       http://www.murphy.nl/
debian:     paul@debian.org      http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: paul@isdn4linux.de   http://www.isdn4linux.de/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
  - From: "Chris Ball" <chris@printf.net>

References:
- Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
  - From: Lauri Tischler <lauri.tischler@efore.fi>
- Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
  - From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
- Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
  - From: Martin Waitz <tali@rommelwood.de>

Prev by Date: Re: the Packages web page [Re: Dissatisfied w/Debian? Make something 'pure'.]
Next by Date: ITP: BIRD
Previous by thread: Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
Next by thread: Re: Ugly Boot on 2.2.15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread