Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:09:37AM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> > Are we allowed to remove things in main which are only used by
> > non-free, and are no longer useful outside that context?
>
> Free Software are not prohibited to be used for comercial or non-free
> use or private use. This Free Software being a library, old or not doesn't
> matter.
>
> It's free software, it has been packaged, and is currently in
> debian. Why would you want to remove it?
Because it is unmaintained and unmaintainable.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr>