On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 06:05:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 03:59:10AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 04:30:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > 4. Supporting non-free software gives nothing to Debian's users > > Uh, since John never said anything of the sort, this is a thunderously > > obvious straw man argument. > > ] 4. Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software > ] ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > You're not really this dense are you, Branden? Since I quoted section 4 of the Social Contract at length elsewhere in this thread, I submit I am not. But frankly it's a little difficult to discern exactly what you mean here, aside from lobbing an insult. > You can't simply say "Well, this doesn't help free software, and may even > hinder it, therefore Debian shouldn't do it" Hmm. Fortunate for me, then, that I didn't actually say that. How about rebutting my actual words next time? -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Mob rule isn't any prettier just because branden@ecn.purdue.edu | you call your mob a government. roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpG_CZHX99Lv.pgp
Description: PGP signature