Re: [testing/release] does potato have to be apt clean?

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> playing around with apt-cache i noticed the following. Do we need to make
> sure, that those problems get fixed, or are most of them (e.g. suggesting
> old packet names) no problem?
> 
> # apt-cache check
>...
> Bad prio make,3.77-5slink == 0
                      ^^^^^

> # apt-cache unmet
>...
> Package telnet version 0.12-4slink.1 has an unmet dep:
>...                           ^^^^^

(and some others)


Are you really sure you tested potato?


cu,
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi