Re: [testing/release] does potato have to be apt clean?
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> playing around with apt-cache i noticed the following. Do we need to make
> sure, that those problems get fixed, or are most of them (e.g. suggesting
> old packet names) no problem?
> # apt-cache check
> Bad prio make,3.77-5slink == 0
> # apt-cache unmet
> Package telnet version 0.12-4slink.1 has an unmet dep:
(and some others)
Are you really sure you tested potato?
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi