[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: majordomo concerns (and putting up for adoption)



Previously Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Majordomo's license is evil: we cannot modify the source and simply
> rebuild the package, without violating the license (this has been
> discussed before). I know Redhat did this. SuSE sent out a message some
> time ago that they are not able to fix their majordomo package due to
> the licensing.

I think we need to do the same. If you agree I'll send an advisory out
later today. 

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpvmef92LxSp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: