[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFPondering: runlevelconf, dependency-based init.d scheme

Previously Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> 	Hi. I recall there has been some talk about the
> 	ugliness of the current sequence-based init.d-scheme
> 	(mostly that its hard to add things in the middle of
> 	the sequence, between two adjacent numbers). I
> 	recall there was talk about a dependency-based
> 	scenario.

Talk to Richard Gooch, he was also doing something similar. I
punched some holes in his design and haven't heard from him
since though :(


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgp0qxKfJnKKD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: