[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 19, 2000



On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 04:12:46AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Colin Watson wrote:
> > debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bugscan@debian.org wrote:
> > >Package: jdk1.1 (debian/non-free)
> > >Maintainer: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
> > >[HELP] Need more info about the effect of this bug; is it RC? (RB)
> > >  60857  Bad path to java-jdk11.1.gz in update-alternatives-jdk1.1
> > 
> > Could somebody NMU this? update-alternatives-jdk1.1 is only invoked by
> > the user, so it's a one-line fix with no side-effects.
> 
> Can someone explain why jdk1.1 has its own version of update-alternatives?
> 
> Wichert.

Typing:

# update-alternatives --config java
# update-alternatives --config jre
# update-alternatives --config appletviewer
# update-alternatives --config jar
# update-alternatives --config javakey
# update-alternatives --config javac
# update-alternatives --config jdb
# update-alternatives --config jdoc
.
.
.

etc. etc.

after you've just tried out another jdk/jre is a bit of a pain.

update-alternatives-jdk1.1 does all this for you.

You get the idea :)

Timshel

-- 
Timshel Knoll <timshel@pobox.com>  Second year Computer Science, RMIT
              http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~tiknoll
       Key ID:         Fingerprint: 
GnuPG  1024D/DE3E8AA7  6ABC 91A9 E274 ED67 0E32 8F0F 5DFA 9391 DE3E 8AA7

Attachment: pgpGuJ4KoTz0g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: