Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement

To: debian-devel Mailing List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 02:48:23 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000518024823.J30455@ecn.purdue.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel Mailing List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000516023040.L17775@debian.org>; from knghtbrd@debian.org on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:30:40AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 3920EE5E.A4F2111D@bigfoot.com> <[🔎] 20000516101806.A494@pear.presence.net.uk> <[🔎] 20000516023040.L17775@debian.org>

On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:30:40AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> Civil disobedience is not a legal defense.

Sure it is.  Read up on jury nullification.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |
Debian GNU/Linux               |    Never attribute to malice that which can
branden@ecn.purdue.edu         |    be adequately explained by stupidity.
roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpVvEoUCcA7U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
  - From: Paul Serice <serice@bigfoot.com>
- Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
  - From: Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Copyright....
Next by Date: Re: unstable/frozen: package conflict?
Previous by thread: Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
Next by thread: Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread