Hi Timshel! On Wed, 17 May 2000, Timshel Knoll wrote: > [please CC all replies to me, I'm on, but don't read, this list ... :)] > > Hi, > > I noticed that lsh (the GPL'd ssh2 clone) isn't in the dist, and there's > no indication that it's being packaged on the wnpp page. If no-one else > is doing anything on it, I would like to package it. You might be interested in this email from Robert Bihlmeyer: >>>>>>> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: Binary name clash (ITP: lsh) From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at> Date: 11 Apr 2000 12:41:08 +0200 I have packaged lsh <http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/index.html>, a free implementation of the ssh2 protocols, but this package has a problem: The upstream version provides a "lsh" binary (comparable to the "ssh" program). The "lsh" Debian package already provides "/usr/bin/lsh". What's the proper protocol when dealing with such a conflict? -- Robbe <<<<<<< cu yours, peter -- PGP encrypted messages prefered. http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/
Attachment:
pgpW1jsrB63qZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature