[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Stallman Admits to Copyright Infringement



On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 01:44:46AM -0500, Paul Serice wrote:
[snipped]

>From Jargon File (4.0.0/24 July 1996) [jargon]:

  troll /v.,n./  [From the Usenet group
     alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on {Usenet}
     designed to attract predictable responses or {flame}s.  Derives
     from the phrase "trolling for {newbie}s" which in turn comes
     from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one
     trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite.  The
     well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and
     flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they
     already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and
     experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll.  If you don't
     fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.

     Some people claim that the troll is properly a narrower category
     than {flame bait}, that a troll is categorized by containing
     some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial.

  flame bait /n./  A posting intended to trigger a {flame
     war}, or one that invites flames in reply.  See also {troll}.

  flame war /n./  (var. `flamewar') An acrimonious dispute,
     especially when conducted on a public electronic forum such as
     {Usenet}.


Noted just for those who didn't know.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification



Reply to: