Re: apt-get should correctly process dependencies
- To: Adrian Bunk <email@example.com>
- Cc: Debian Developers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: apt-get should correctly process dependencies
- From: Pedro Guerreiro <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:19:50 +0100
- Message-id: <20000420151950.C4385@bigfoot.com>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 02:49:10PM +0200
- References: <200004191433.PAA301387@mozart.si.ualg.pt> <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 02:49:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 100, Pedro Miguel Guerreiro wrote:
> > Hi.
> > When installing a fresh potato, the following has happened:
> > I've installed just the base files, and then I'm installing one by one, only
> > tha packages that I want, in no special order, as I'm needing them. When I
> > tryed to install linuxconf, apt-get give me the following:
> > The reasoning is: apt-get should see that linuxconf depends on logrotate, and
> > that this dependes on mailx, the same way as it sees that mailx dependes on
> > liblockfile1 and zmailer-ssl, and install (or suggest to) the whole pack.
> Which version of apt do you use? The version in slink or the one in
> potato? The release notes for potato will include a notice that you should
> update apt before doing any other updates.
Please read my initial statment: "When installing a fresh potato..." :-)