Re: Bug#62352: usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:49:32PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
|On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 02:41:50PM +0900, Julian Stoev wrote:
|> Should I file this as a bug? I think - Yes.
|No. Packages are not required to implement that version of policy for
|potato, as I understand it. It is not a bug -- otherwise we would
|not need /usr/doc at all.
I think /usr/doc is needed by some applications. But the current policy states,
that documentaion should be available also in /usr/share/doc and other applications
expect the documentation to be there.
Maybe the best and easyest thing would be to make a symlink from /usr/doc/xfstt
to /usr/share/doc/xfstt. I think the xfstt maintainer should spend 30 seconds to
put this into his package.
BTW, the vim documentation has some strange things too. I think documents such as
tutorial.txt should be available also in /usr/share/doc/...