[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DUL (was Re: RBL report..)



On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 09:59:03PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > None, it is not necessary.
> 
> That is your opinion and it has not been christened as Best Currect
> Practice by an RFC.

Please re-read; I said not necessary, and not "not desirable."
I personally do not find it desirable, but you do. Surely you would
not claim it was necessary, ie essential, though.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>


Reply to: