On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 06:58:18PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 02:38:24AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > The problem with DUL is that they don't care if the people > > blocked ever sent any spam. The have the wrong color ski^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H > > type of connection, and must be the enemy. > > The analogy is flawed. Solutions have been offered several > times owner for DUL-listed or potentially DUL-listed users. > All of which should not be too difficult to set up for > a Debian developer. You demonstrate limited facility to construe the analogy. The "solutions" that have been offered effectively result in concealing the fact that the ultimate origin of the mail is a dynamic IP, therefore this is like asking people with the "wrong color skin" to paint it an "acceptable" color. What mechanism do you propose that people on dynamic IP's use to identify their mails as non-spam while still making direct SMTP connections to the MX host of the destination domain? -- G. Branden Robinson | The first thing the communists do when Debian GNU/Linux | they take over a country is to outlaw branden@ecn.purdue.edu | cockfighting. roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks
Attachment:
pgpFniswWpqbz.pgp
Description: PGP signature