Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 31, 2000
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:13:38AM -0800, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> > Caution, IANAD. Just tring to help
> > Package: cricket (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > 56948 cricket depends on non-existant package
> > Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> > Maintainer: Guy Maor <email@example.com>
> > 60707 cricket depends on a nonexistent package
> > Shouldn't these be merged?
> No, you can only merge bugs on the same package. One is against the
> pacakge itself, the other is for ftp.debian.org to remove that package.
Perhaps the first should be reassignet to ftp.debian.org, too? Both bug
reports say that cricket is not installable because it depends on a
package that was removed from potato because of RC bugs.
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi