[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: tinydns and dnscache



Yes, you are correct.  The sections I was looking at are non-free/net for
dnscache, and non-free/misc for daemontools.

These will both be source packages, with build-$PACKAGE scripts, just like
qmail.

The license is:

"You may distribute copies of dnscache-1.00.tar.gz, with MD5 checksum
67d51c5403c03f08d6ba8fff0108ab27."

daemontools doesn't have any specific license attributed to it, so we will 
have to go by Dan's statements at http://cr.yp.to/softwarelaw.html

--Adam

On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:50:31AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:52:59PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > I just subscribed, and I'd like to let the list know I'm (hopefully) going to
> > be working on a couple of new packages, namely tinydns/dnscache by djb, which
> > is a replacement for BIND, and djb's "daemontools", (which is required for
> > running tinydns).
> 
> Since the letters "djb" appear here, I guess it goes without saying that
> these will have to go in non-free, but please mention the license when
> posting ITP's.
> 
> -- 
> G. Branden Robinson            |    If you wish to strive for peace of soul,
> Debian GNU/Linux               |    then believe; if you wish to be a
> branden@ecn.purdue.edu         |    devotee of truth, then inquire.
> roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |    -- Friedrich Nietzsche



Reply to: