Re: RBL report..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It is rumored that on 26-Mar-2000 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:41:09AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
>> The domain's technical contact.
>
> Ideally, yes. In practice, I'd say that's no more likely to work
> than postmaster@domain. I've seen NIC entries with technical contacts
> called "NOC Administrator <blah@hotmail.com>"; do you think hotmail
> addresses should be acceptable for domain contacts? I don't but apparently
Yes.
Think of the case when you are out of connectivity and have to change to new
dns servers and your auth scheme happens to be "mail from:". If your email was
from non-neutral ground you would have had to deal with internic personally.
Though after the invention of auth-DES and other more sane auth schemes at the
registries this is no longer the case but quite a lot of people still keep
their info using an off-site address.
;-)
[snip]
- ----------------------------------
Anton R. Ivanov
IP Engineer Level3 Communications
RIPE: ARI2-RIPE E-Mail: Anton Ivanov <aivanov@eu.level3.net>
@*** Uhlmann's Razor ***
When stupidity is a sufficient explanation, there is no need
to have recourse to any other.
Corollary: "It seemed like the thing to do at the time."
- ----------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBON9LailWAw/bM84zAQEjpwf/YuatKapv0VN6mC4xZnO0FJ7JP9BlddDQ
dPhUrN+yffECHptkYYHcuPnVFhhiScZboqEarWnWdUGaswIwpXNO/ROxKJWNlb1h
08z0vIlVRVfw5Vx4eAKpRLRpDlh2vo2qkdmzHLk5dk+KDCv/AEIyyxPqmCyXCUuQ
xnVaDt0blmhxy+wA0LV91WVhh4JjGB4D72wf9RhmHcwGJMuOIhv3UIQM8Dx9nCkf
bD+zT80w95G9LZfsIaoem7EMWl8FnZsOZgtPuL7zf0IbgaeZkfPkrr9Sv9VDDFd1
q89g/4BhDP3XOn4+rSrWYvRm6yjPz5OReVjg8bc9fWFrVT8/uR8+0w==
=yVvu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: