On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:56:09PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 07:01:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > fixed and the new version of quota should go into woody--better the > > devil we know that the devil we don't. (And we really don't need another > > "well, this new version is ok" exception in potato. RCB's only, and lets > > get this thing out the door.) > > I'm not so sure. Frankly, I don't like the idea of having to check each > patch to see if it is correctly done (I assume the upstream has done it > correctly). Why would you be checking patches? The quota in potato has been tested and there are no RC bug reports for it. What needs to change? -- Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpq7lIoP5QXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature