Re: Packages NOT removed from frozen
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> The following packages had bugs that are older than two weeks (almost
> three, now), but they are too important to remove from frozen.
> This means that these bugs are likely to delay the release of potato!
> Please look at them to see if you can help.
> Richard Braakman
> Package: perl-base (debian/main).
> Maintainer: Darren Stalder <email@example.com>
> 53794 perl policy is flawed -- 5.004 and 5.005 simultaneous
Is there a good reason why we do need the perl-5.004* packages?