Re: Packages removed from frozen
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Packages removed from frozen
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 01 Mar 2000 13:44:10 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: Manoj Srivastava's message of "09 Feb 2000 05:30:37 -0600"
- References: <20000128161610.A13321@xs4all.nl> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20000207142942.A14269@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20000208003751.A22760@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> <email@example.com>
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> In other words, as far as possible programs should be
> buildable from source, unless that is impossible, and in which
> case some extra steps should be required: asking for permissin and
> inclusio in teh security FAQW do not seem to be too onerous.
But the program *IS* buildable from source. You may not like the
language the source is written in, but it *is* buildable from source.