On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 05:32:30PM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: > All that aside, the OSD says it *is* an opensource license, and IIRC, > everything which complies with the OSD (except for QPL) should also be > DFSG-compliant, so technically it shouldn't be a problem to base a > distribution on this (even though I am not sure I'd still want to). Since when is the QPL not DFSG-complaint? The FSF has said it's free, and we're releasing Potato with packages under the QPL in main. (libqt2, for one.) Let's not gratuitiously stir up more trouble. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are. -- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
Attachment:
pgp3GNgOfUO5G.pgp
Description: PGP signature