[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

QPL Re: Darwin?



On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 05:32:30PM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> All that aside, the OSD says it *is* an opensource license, and IIRC,
> everything which complies with the OSD (except for QPL) should also be
> DFSG-compliant, so technically it shouldn't be a problem to base a
> distribution on this (even though I am not sure I'd still want to).

Since when is the QPL not DFSG-complaint? The FSF has said it's free,
and we're releasing Potato with packages under the QPL in main. (libqt2,
for one.) Let's not gratuitiously stir up more trouble.

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
   -- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU

Attachment: pgpvXZvs8e7jK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: