Re: Microsoft going "Open Source"?
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Andrei Ivanov wrote:
> They still think closed source is more reliable (at least BG does).
> Has anyone had experience with W2K yet? Any comments on it? (aside from
> the fact that its missing a load of drivers and OS takes 55M to boot)
Seems to work O.K., but is resource hungry. Very much so. It's easy to see
how. For example, the menus don't just "scroll in" anymore, they fade
in. Good way to spend a server's resources. ;-)
"Party on, contest winners, party on."
-- Slurms McKenzie