On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 05:08:01PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> Daniel Burrows (Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu) wrote:
> > What should be done about packages that have documentation in /usr/share/doc
> > but not in /usr/doc (ie, no symlink..for example, grub) or (worse) have some
> > sort of messed up situation where /usr/doc/<package> gets removed from the dpkg
> > database but the directory is still there (python did this for a while..it left
> > a .dhelp file behind and the directory couldn't be deleted), or where the
> > documentation is split between /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc?
>
> i thought that /usr/share/doc was the right place, according to the FHS. am
> i wrong?
He refers to those that are in /usr/share but don't have a link in /usr/doc
pointing to /usr/share/doc, which should be the normal situation.
One question here: bind-doc installs the documentation in
/usr/share/doc/bind, and Debian related docs (changelog.Debian and
copyright) live in /usr/share/doc/bind-doc. This is not correct, isn't it?
Just noticed this afternoon.
ls'ing /usr/doc gives a big amount of directories that should be links to
../share/doc.
--
____________________________________________________
/ Rediscovering Freedom, Using Debian GNU/Linux \
/ \
| Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es |
| Oskuro in RL-MUD || jordi@sindominio.net |
| http://sindominio.net |
\ telnet pusa.informat.uv.es 23 /
\____________________________________________________/
Attachment:
pgpWoMLffj6r4.pgp
Description: PGP signature