Re: mutt and ncurses

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mutt and ncurses
From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:53:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000131195300.D1378@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0001311559370.27100-100000@v2.ldsol.com>; from vincent@ldsol.com on Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 04:00:05PM +0000
References: <[🔎] 20000131115534.B736@wonderland.linux.it> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0001311559370.27100-100000@v2.ldsol.com>

On Jan 31, Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com> wrote:

 >> Should I compile it with ncurses 5 for slink?
 >no: ncurses 5 is not available for slink.
Oops. I Actually was thinking potato.
Please advise...

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt and ncurses
  - From: Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.de>

References:
- mutt and ncurses
  - From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Re: Why no package seems to take care of the new /dev/console device?
Next by Date: Re: Why no package seems to take care of the new /dev/console device?
Previous by thread: mutt and ncurses
Next by thread: Re: mutt and ncurses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread