* Marco d'Itri said: > On Jan 25, Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl> wrote: > > >Every time I'm reminded of bind attaching itself to each interface > >explicitly, I wonder why it does that (and doesn't simply bind to > >0.0.0.0). _Is_ there a valid reason? > Yes, the RFC requires responses coming out of the same interface the > question came in. And also binding to the default interface will make binding to the dynamic ones not to work, correct? marek
Attachment:
pgp7K5x9FTbv2.pgp
Description: PGP signature