Joe Drew wrote: > It's hard to say what the intention of rms was on this. I may be wrong, not being able to see into Richard's mind, but I would hazard a guess. It's so that Free Software can be written for and ported to nonfree operating systems. The nearest nonfree equivalents to Qt would be Motif and MFC. And in both cases there are GPLd applications using them with no legal hassles at all. David Johnson