Re: tasks
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Michael Stone wrote:
> OTOH, uw imapd is a security nightmare that comes back to bite another
> popular distribution with a new remote root exploit every six months or
> so.
Could you back this allegation up with some facts? A _long_ time ago
there was a notorious root exploit which as the bane of Red Hat users
everywhere but the Debian package was immune. (This was back when Dwarf
maintained it I believe.) Since I took over the only security problem
I've had to fix was an exploit in ipop2d.
So if there are all these hideous security holes, I'd really like to know.
I wouldn't allow it anywhere near one of my servers, and think that
> making it more prominant in debian is a horrible idea.
>
Well bully for you. What are you suggesting as an alternative?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tasks
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- References:
- Re: tasks
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>