Re: US Encryption Policy Change Now Official!
Bear Giles writes:
> BTW, for the same reason I'm not entirely sure that many ham radio
> packages should be considered non-DFSG. If the sole purpose of a package
> is operation of a device which requires a gov't license to operate, is it
> non-DFSG for the license to restrict the use of the license to only those
> who can legally use the software?
It forbids me to modify the package and use it for a purpose which does not
require a gov't license to operate.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
Reply to: