Re: dependancy problem in potato
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 06:10:10PM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> | The kernel-source package (2.2.13) came in .bz2
> | format, but there is no dependancy on the bzip2
> | package. (Which means you can't unpack it!)
>
> What do people think of changing bzip2 priority/section to required/base?
I don't think "required" is needed, as you can run even a minimal Debian
system without bzip2. AFAICT "important" would be good.
About the section: the whole concept of "base" section is not valid anymore,
in fact, I think we should phase it out in the next unstable.
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: