Re: ITP: debwrap
Noka/Omoikane wrote:
> No.
> I am talking about how to achive to manage default settings
> for a lot of packages in a noninteractive manner.
> In other words, I am talking about lack of flexibility of
> debconf's noninteractive mode.
> It seems that debconf's noninteractive mode works but not
> fine because of inflexiblity of the default settings.
> But I am sure to agree in the long run debconf to have such
> flexiblity in the future development phase, hopefully.
What are you talking about?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: