Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org> writes:
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 12:10:16PM -0500, Steve Dunham wrote:
> > Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > If that is how everyone feels, then it is fine with me, I'm only giving
> > > my suggestions. I'll support the libraries as best I can no matter what
> > > the general decision is.
> >
> > IMHO, we should just PAM-ify everything and setup the default config
> > files to emulate the old behaviour. RedHat has been using PAM for
> > quite a while and the
> ^^^^^ what is the end of the sentence
Err, "and it causes short term memory loss".
RH hasn't had any huge problems with PAM, and I think they have pretty
thoroughly tested it.
(OTOH, in Debian, without PAM, there seems to be problems with
netgroup handling in /etc/host.equiv.)
Steve
dunham@cse.msu.edu
Reply to:
- References:
- PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Ben Collins <bmc@it.larc.nasa.gov>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Steve Dunham <dunham@cse.msu.edu>
- Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
- From: Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org>