Re: PAM, Potato, Packages -- things that begine with 'P'
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Now the proposal, how do we get PAM completely into potato, from telnet
> to ftp, to ssh? There are a lot of apps that need to use pam, I'm
> suggesting, for the users sake, that in potato we make pam'ified apps
> optional (ie. have a telnetd and a telnetd-pam), maybe by post-potato
> release, we can drop this usage and be completely PAM enabled.
>
How about creating a staging area as has been proposed for gtk apps.
This way they could be created as drop in replacements for the existing
apps, i.e. no renaming. Once stable, they get moved into unstable in
one shot.
Jay Treacy
Reply to: