Re: x11amp
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I don't see why we ought to let some lawyers trying to make a good bluff
> > scare us.
>
> Fraunhofer institute holds the patent, we shouldn't take any chances.
The fact that they hold *a* patent does not put Debian in any sort of
jeopardy. If anything, it would be the authors; Debian is complying with
GPL completely.
> They have already treathened to sue or sued several people who used
> their encoder engine - let's hope that they won't get to the decoders.
Threatened. Not sued. I have yet to see any evidence that they have a
patent applicable to decoders.
> Debian has been very paranoid to the vague licencing terms of some
> progs in the past, from what I've seen.
The licensing terms are not vague: it's GPL. That's about as solid as you
can get.
> But that is not the reason why my first guess was non-free. It was
> the fact that mpg123 is in non-free, and x11amp is (according to
> the docs) based on it.
mpg123 is in non-free because of its license. I did not find any
documentation anywhere that indicated that x11amp uses any mpg123 code.
(Where are you looking?) Since it's released as GPL, it's free.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: x11amp
- From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
- Re: x11amp
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- References:
- Re: x11amp
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: x11amp
- From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: x11amp
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: x11amp
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>