Re: ITP: debwrap
Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> IMO the idea of debwrap, not the source code, is an ugly hack. Trying
> to be too compatible always leads to an dirty hack. Debwrap just
> wraps the problematic packages; the better solution is to fix the
> Well, of course debwrap may be useful for now.
Ok, I agree with it, too.
Off course trying to be too compatible usually leads to dirty hacks.
But are we supposed to give it a try in case if it is practical
Remember that Linux was born initially as a very dirty easy hack
from a viewpoint of minix or BSD people, they said...
I believe practical beats ideal in the world of Linux.
Shigekazu Noka <firstname.lastname@example.org>