Re: question about "non-us" becoming "free-world" (was Re: Quake is GPL)
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 04:11:27AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> My question is this:
> If "non-us" is being renamed to "free-world", then shouldn't all of main
> be in free-world?
Its not being renamed yet. There were a proposal of renaming it because crypto
in France, and a few other countries are banned. `free-world' mean :
`Packages which should be stored in free-world, cause in some other parts of
world some of these packages are illegal (using, having, distributing, exporting
or something else)'.
Main is : `Packages than can be stored anywhere in both free and non-free world'