[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)

On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:10:51AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> It's section 4.2 of policy.  The last couple of paragraphs are not at
> all clear on this point.  While they say that the .la files should go
> in the -dev package, they also seem to encourage putting them in the
> runtime package instead.
> Maybe this one needs to go to -policy to thrash out.

By all means. We don't need anymore packages breaking because of the lack
of forceful wording to have these in the -dev package if they are used at


/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`     bcollins@debian.org  -  collinbm@djj.state.va.us  -  bmc@visi.net    '

Reply to: