Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:10:27 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991207211027.A29689@rising.com.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991207014637.18032C-100000@shell.twu.net>; from Caspian on Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 01:54:37AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 199912070638.XAA05318@aztec.santafe.edu> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991207014637.18032C-100000@shell.twu.net>

On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 01:54:37AM -0500, Caspian wrote:
> I really doubt it. For one, pico's command set is very different from

Also would pico users really like their editor taking eight megs of RAM? :-)
(Or is it eighteen.. perhaps eighty.)


Hamish, ducking..
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: Caspian <caspian@twu.net>

Prev by Date: Good optimize idea! (Re: ramblings about old hardware, gzip, bz2, and pentium opts)
Next by Date: Re: Package Pool Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
Next by thread: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread