On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 07:22:39AM -0500, Michael Stenner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > Maybe Debian should fork our own procps again. At Red Hat it is obviously > > > under less than capable management. > > > > Not sure. Perhaps it's just the wrong person who wrote the manpage. I > > believe there are a lot of capable Linux developers at RedHat. Let's > > ask Alan Cox for his opinion on that manpage :) > > For fun, here's the RedHat 6.1 version: > > .\" Man page for ps. > .\" Licensed under version 2 of the GNU General Public License. > .\" Modified by Michael K. Johnson from a gross plain-text hack > .\" by Albert Cahalan of Michael's original version. Well, then, we should be using this instead. Maybe Red Hat *is* capable of doing good things, when they're not busy selling Heinz ketchup. :-/ -- G. Branden Robinson | Convictions are more dangerous enemies Debian GNU/Linux | of truth than lies. branden@ecn.purdue.edu | -- Friedrich Nietzsche roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpQa_j_r73mg.pgp
Description: PGP signature