Re: New science section

To: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>
Cc: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>, Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New science section
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <filipvr@xs4all.be>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:29:38 +0100
Message-id: <383542B2.883EABA1@xs4all.be>
References: <19991118155850.A9060@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <199911181538.KAA13110@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> <19991118204253.B389@priv3.onet.pl>

Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 10:38:20AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> [cut]
> > geg 0.99.0-3         a GTK+ Equation Grapher
> 
> Is this really deeply scientific ?
> I would leave it in math, unless we closes math at all.
Isn't math supposed to be a science?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New science section
  - From: David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>
- Re: New science section
  - From: Christian Surchi <christian@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: New science section
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>

References:
- Re: New science section
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: New science section
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
- Re: New science section
  - From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 19, 1999
Next by Date: Re: Debian FreeBSD
Previous by thread: Re: New science section
Next by thread: Re: New science section
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread