Re: ITP: Debian History
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 11:44:48AM +0000, Edward Betts wrote:
> I agree on making it doc, not text, but I disagree on extra. It is unlikely to
> break your system, so it should be optional.
The definition of "extra" is not "it will break your system".
>From Debian Policy Manual v. 220.127.116.11, section 2.2. Priorities:
This contains packages that conflict with others with higher
priorities, or are only likely to be useful if you already know
what they are or have specialized requirements.
I agree, a Debian history document does not qualify for extra, so it
should be optional.
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % email@example.com % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%