[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: all xterms



On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >   Uh, yes you can check signatures.  Just tell it where to look.
> 
> Sorry for this example, but my soul is dark and full of criminal ideas.
> Example:
> 
> 1)
> *EVIL CRACKER* does
> `which pgp'
> `which gpg'
> `cat /etc/Muttrc|grep p?gpg?'
> and a few tests more
> now he knows what to do now
> 
> 2)
> admin have someone's key and uses mutt
> 
> 3)
> *EVIL CRACKER* sends him a mail from someone admin knows good
> with faken info. This mail is signed with *A WRONG KEY*
> 
> 4)
> there is >50% chance than admin wont bother to check mail by
> pgp from command line. Most of them have motto of
> 'I will fix it tommorow'(here:it = mutt) and believe that if someone
> signed mail it is validly signed

NO.

The admin has the correct path to pgp or gpg in his .muttrc.  So it gives
him the 'bad key' error.

> 
> 5)
> he uses the wrong info and makes security hole
> 
> 6)
> *EVIL CRACKER* exploits this hole
> 
> This will need a good expert on social engeenering and some luck
> but it is a *little* security hole

I disagree

/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd	       |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/


Reply to: