Re: mutt and ncurses

To: Alexander Koch <efraim@argh.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mutt and ncurses
From: "Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 18:16:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991029181649.C217@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: Alexander Koch <efraim@argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <19991029062828.A32479@deadend.argh.org>; from efraim@argh.org on Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 06:28:28AM +0000
References: <19991029062828.A32479@deadend.argh.org>

On Oct 29, Alexander Koch <efraim@argh.org> wrote:
 
 >Why is mutt linked with ncurses? Why not slang anymore?
The author likes more ncurses, but I had so many bug reports I will
compile 1.0 with slang again.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt and ncurses
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: libc6 problems (maybe)?
Next by Date: Re: libc6 problems (maybe)?
Previous by thread: Re: Problem with ppp/sendmail
Next by thread: Re: mutt and ncurses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread