Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command

[Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>]

On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 02:22:54PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> So which of the two latter options do you support. An exception for
> echo in the policy or getting rid of the reference to POSIX?

In addition to everything that's already been said, policy already
mentions echo -n 10 times in examples, so in a sense policy already
endorses this optional aspect of the POSIX standard.

However, because I'm tired of this subject, I've proposed a less than
one sentence change to policy to explicitly require echo -n support
from /bin/sh

-- 
Raul