[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#28232: marked as done (A bunch of X packages just vanished!)



Your message dated Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:10:28 -0700
with message-id <19991017161028.B28760@frantica.lly.org>
and subject line no bug, no bug closing cabal, same diff
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 1998 04:41:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 27639 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 1998 04:41:43 -0000
Delivered-To: bugs@debian.org
Received: (qmail 27624 invoked from network); 20 Oct 1998 04:41:41 -0000
Received: from golden.brown.edu (128.148.128.3)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 1998 04:41:41 -0000
Received: from bluegreen (keeney180-203.keeney.brown.edu [128.148.180.203])
	by golden.brown.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA21598
	for <bugs@debian.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 00:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brown.edu (really [127.0.0.1]) by keeney180-203.keeney.brown.edu
	via smail with esmtp (ident daniel using rfc1413)
	id <m0zVTZd-000OYnC@bluegreen> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
	for <bugs@debian.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 00:39:09 -0400 (EDT) 
Message-Id: <m0zVTZd-000OYnC@bluegreen>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 00:39:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu
Reply-To: Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu
Subject: A bunch of X packages just vanished!
To: bugs@debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.4.0.30
Severity: Important

  I hope this is a real bug and not something dumb I'm doing.

  I just downloaded the latest package file and discovered that a
number of packages--including xdm, xterm, and several other X
programs--were apparently updated.  The unusual thing is that they
magically vanished from the "installed" list and are listed as being
completely NEW packages.  The old packages seem to have migrated to
/dev/null (figuratively).  Am I safe to install these 'new' packages
without having junk files left behind from the older packages--and
(more importantly) why did this happen?  It seems to me like dpkg and
apt-get shouldn't allow packages to vanish in a puff of smoke like
that... (which is why I'm reporting it as related to dpkg).

  I'm also running the latest apt-get, could this be a bug in that?

  A large number of files are also correctly marked as being updated
  (libc6, libstdc++, eterm, ....)

  Daniel Burrows

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 28232-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 1999 23:10:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 13330 invoked from network); 17 Oct 1999 23:10:30 -0000
Received: from sense-sea-pm4-29.oz.net (HELO frantica.lly.org) (216.39.133.125)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 1999 23:10:30 -0000
Received: from rcw by frantica.lly.org with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
	for 28232-done@bugs.debian.org
	id 11czRc-0007UR-00; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:10:28 -0700
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:10:28 -0700
From: Robert Woodcock <rcw@debian.org>
To: 28232-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: no bug, no bug closing cabal, same diff
Message-ID: <19991017161028.B28760@frantica.lly.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre3i
Sender: Robert Woodcock <rcw@frantica.lly.org>

blah, this is already handled by the slink release documentation.
-- 
Robert Woodcock - rcw@debian.org
"Hacking... is a completely creepy thing to do." -- US Department Of Justice


Reply to: