Re: How about some uniformity in doc names
Johnie Ingram <email@example.com> writes:
> Just noticed there are 113 packages using the 'foo-doc' convention,
> and 7 using 'foo-docs.' Does anyone else think it would be nice if
> everything was foo-doc?
> Policy doesn't cover this currently.
While you're at it, I think policy should also provide guidance
about whether the foo-doc package belongs in the same Section as
foo, or belongs in the doc section.
In my opinion, it belongs in the same section as foo, but there
are probably exceptions.