[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: moving mutt to standard priority

Marco d'Itri wrote:

>  >vi: vim
>  >I am not arguring this should be the recommended editor, just the recommended
>  >version of vi. I do not think that any package should be the recommended
> I agree... Why does it have a lower priority in alternatives than nvi?

Just so that the 'Standard' installation isn't bloated by 10 different versions of
*every* editor out there?

Reply to: